Explore Reflex
Find the decision hiding in your workflow.
These are real public examples from the Brida Reflex repository. Start from the event you already have, then adapt the smallest useful decision to your process.
Paste the prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or your agent. It will help map these patterns to your own work.
A new lead arrives
Is this lead worth follow-up?
Compare bounded lead facts with an explicit ICP before spending sales time.
A customer message arrives
Self-serve, queue, or escalate?
Recommend the right handling branch without sending a reply or changing the ticket.
A marketplace brief arrives
Is this work a credible fit?
Decide whether a bounded automation can realistically fulfill a brief before deeper work.
A catalog listing is normalized
Physical, digital, service, or review?
Classify the primary listing type while collecting independent quality and clarification signals over the same bounded state.
An invoice is normalized
Does this invoice need review?
Run arithmetic and exact validation first, then classify the remaining semantic exception.
A parser returns uncertain text
Continue, OCR, or review?
Choose the next extraction path after exact document checks no longer settle the result.
Two normalized records remain ambiguous
Same entity, different, or review?
Handle the fuzzy remainder only after stable identifiers and exact exclusions have run.
A task enters the queue
Run now, defer, or escalate?
Make a cheap scheduling decision from bounded context before waking expensive work.
An operational signal changes
Observe, investigate, or get human attention?
Classify handling depth after hard severity thresholds and known signatures have run.
A code or config change is ready
How deep should review go?
Recommend routine, focused, or specialist review after deterministic repository policy.
Work claims to be complete
Complete, resume, or review?
Judge whether bounded deterministic evidence actually supports a completion claim.
A successful response comes back
Continue, review failure, or stay unresolved?
Distinguish real completion from semantic failure or acknowledgement after transport checks pass.
A policy changes
No change, impact review, or review?
Judge whether a bounded policy change materially affects a component after exact version, ownership and scope checks.
A research claim is proposed
Continue, verify, or stop?
Decide whether bounded evidence supports continuing or needs further verification.
A new external event appears
Ignore, investigate, or surface?
Classify relevance to an explicit research question after freshness and deduplication checks.
Retrieval returns a candidate
Keep this evidence or discard it?
Judge bounded semantic relevance after access, source and exact-filter controls.
A cache candidate exists
Is this cached answer applicable?
Judge semantic equivalence only after tenant, TTL, version and invalidation checks pass.
A dataset example is proposed
Keep, review, or drop this example?
Score the semantic quality of a synthetic training or evaluation example after exact validation.
A structured record passes exact validation
Consistent, exception review, or review?
Judge semantic contradictions only after schema, type, range and deterministic invariant checks have already passed.
Untrusted text enters a workflow
Routine, isolate, or security review?
Add a bounded semantic risk signal after parsing, isolation and authorization controls.
A browser action is proposed
Candidate, review, or block?
Classify semantic action risk without bypassing the browser tool’s own authorization policy.
Content reaches a policy boundary
Ordinary, review, or restricted?
Classify against explicit bounded policy categories while side effects remain elsewhere.
A tactical game state changes
Advance, defend, retreat, hold, or review?
Choose among an already-authorized legal action set after the game engine applies hard rules.
An agent has taken several steps
Continue, inspect, or review?
Judge whether recent work made meaningful semantic progress after deterministic retry checks.
A new observation may be worth remembering
Store candidate, ignore, or review?
Judge durable future usefulness only after privacy, retention and no-store checks pass.
A draft is generated
Publish candidate, revise, or reject?
Score a draft against explicit criteria before another expensive generation or review cycle.
Templates
Three shapes cover a lot of real decisions.
Start from a typed shape instead of a blank prompt. Keep the question bounded, define the uncertainty branch, and leave side-effect authority outside Reflex.
Binary
Yes / no + uncertaintyFor bounded semantic questions with explicit true, false and review paths.
Open template ↗ TemplateChoice
One route from an allowlistFor routing or classification where the allowed branches are known in advance.
Open template ↗ TemplateScore
Rubric → bounded branchesFor quality, fit or risk scoring against an explicit small rubric.
Open template ↗Official recipes
Stable contracts for common reflexes.
Recipes are versioned public contracts with a narrower promise than a general Custom Reflex. Hosted availability is queried separately from the open-source registry.
Agent Wakeup
Decide whether an event deserves expensive agent work.
Agent Router
Recommend a bounded route inside a deterministic candidate allowlist.
Context Pruner
Identify removable semantic context while pinned/system state stays protected.
Tool Risk
Provide advisory semantic risk before deterministic tool authorization.
Quality Gate
Recommend pass, review or stop against a bounded quality contract.
Your process is probably different
Give your AI the context. Let it find the reflexes.
The copied prompt starts from your recurring events, proposes the three highest-value bounded decisions, and helps you implement the first one in the environment you already use.